Visit
to the Philippines of Professor Rodolfo Stavenhagen,
UN Special Rapporteur for the Human Rights of Indigenous
Peoples
The Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental
freedoms of indigenous people, Professor Rodolfo Stavenhagen,
concluded a ten-day official visit to the Philippines at
the invitation of the Government on 11 December 2002.
The purpose of the visit was to gather information from
governmental officials, indigenous peoples, non-governmental
organizations and the United Nations system relating to
the human rights situation of the indigenous people in the
country.
The Special Rapporteur met with various Philippine officials
including the Secretary of the Environment and Natural Resources,
the Under-Secretary of the Department of Justice, the Under-Secretary
of the Department of National Defense, the Co-Vice Chair
of Task Force 63, the Presidential Adviser on Peace, the
Chair of the Commission for Human Rights, the Commissioners
and Executive Director of the National Commission for Indigenous
Peoples, and the Chair of the Commission on the Role of
Filipino Women. He also met with the Bishop of Butuan, the
President and members of the academic community of the University
of the Philippines and other academic institutions, and
the president of the Philippine Chamber of Mines.
The Special Rapporteur had fruitful meetings with indigenous
peoples’ and human rights organizations, notably in
Baguio City, Mankayan, and Butuan as well as in Manila,
which provided him with information from a wide and representative
segment of the indigenous peoples’ organizations in
the country. He also visited the Victoria mine where he
met with members of the mining community,
In the press conference in Manila on 11 December 2002 at
the conclusion of his visit, Mr. Stavenhagen made the following
comments:
The Republic of the Philippines is a society that can be
justly proud of its great variety of peoples, languages
and cultures. Around 15% of the total population is composed
of indigenous cultural communities or indigenous peoples,
who are present in more than 50 of the country’s 78
provinces. The numerous indigenous peoples retaining their
traditions and values from long before European colonization,
contribute to the strong cultural identity and uniqueness
of the Philippine nation.
But for a long time, mainstream Philippine society ignored
its indigenous component and did little to improve the standards
of living of its indigenous cultural communities or to overcome
the high rates of poverty and low levels of human development
(as defined by the United Nations), which characterized
these populations. Indeed, far from being full and equal
partners in the construction of the modern nation, the indigenous
peoples have been largely excluded, discriminated against
and marginalized.
Various major human rights issues were brought to the attention
of the Special Rapporteur during his visit, of which the
following, inter alia, deserve particular mention.
The 1997 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA)
IPRA constitutes the main legal reference for IP’s
human rights, but its adequate implementation is still an
unfulfilled promise, particularly because it may enter into
conflict with other laws (such as the Mining Act of 1995)
and because, according to some experts, IPRA itself contains
flaws that do not favor IPs entirely.
Furthermore, the agencies responsible for IPRA’s
implementation have not yet been able to coordinate their
activities effectively, particularly NCIP and DENR as regards
the contentious issue of CADCs and CADTs. Indigenous people
state that the benefits of IPRA have not yet reached their
communities. In this period of transition the role of Task
Force 63 to deal with emergency situations involving indigenous
peoples becomes an essential tool for the effective implementation
of human rights legislation.
Resource management and Sustainable Development
The land rights problem is closely related to the issues
surrounding economic development strategies. Many communities
resist being forced or pressured into development projects
which destroy their traditional economy, community structures,
and cultural values, a process that has been aptly described
as “development aggression.”
Serious human rights violations have been reported to the
Special Rapporteur regarding the implications for indigenous
communities of economic activities such as logging, mining,
the building of dams, commercial plantations and other development
projects. Sometimes, the effects appear to have been catastrophic
for the people concerned, and entire areas are reported
to have been devastated without regard to the wishes and
rights of indigenous communities. These environmental damages
and human rights denials have been systematically documented
and independently verified by national and international
institutions.
Despite legal safeguards such as those referring to free,
prior and informed consent, or environmental impact and
assessment studies, indigenous peoples report that their
concerns are generally not given due attention and that
powerful economic and political interests prevail over their
legitimate rights. This has quite frequently led to protest
action by indigenous organizations, confrontation and conflict,
resulting at times in the prosecution, harassment, and imprisonment
of indigenous activists for their involvement in the protection
of the rights of their environment and communities.
Militarisation and serious human rights violations
The Special Rapporteur has received reports of arbitrary
detentions, persecution and summary executions of community
representatives; of coercion, forced recruitment, and also
rape, perpetrated by individuals pertaining to the armed
forces, the police or so-called paramilitaries in the framework
of counter-insurgency activities. These allegations are
documented and substantiated, and yet the victims claim
that they do not receive due process and justice in the
courts or the relevant government agencies when they file
their complaints about such alleged violations.
The militarisation of a number of indigenous areas was
mentioned to the Special Rapporteur repeatedly, including
the practice of hamleting (congregating indigenous peoples
into specified locations againts their will). There are
reports of indigenous people being accused and prosecuted
of terrorist activity simply because of their involvement
in legitimate protest or the defense of their rights. Human
rights defense organizations have also been harassed, in
violation of national legislation and international human
rights law.
The Special Rapporteur considers that these extremely serious
allegations must be investigated by the competent authorities
at the highest level, and the guilty parties brought to
justice. Similarly, the indigenous victims (persons and
communities) should be adequately compensated and protected
from further abuses.
Lack of Basic Social Services for Indigenous Peoples
The Special Rapporteur has received numerous reports of
indigenous peoples not being able to receive the benefits
of the social services to which they should have a right.
Various surveys and studies also report that human development
indicators are lower, and poverty indicators higher, for
indigenous peoples than the rest of society. While there
are no systematic disaggregated statistics to support these
findings, there appears to be a valid correlation between
lower human development indicators and high density of indigenous
populations in certain provinces. In many indigenous communities
basic health services are not available, and preventable
disease abound. Access to basic education is severely restricted.
Upon the completion of his mission, the Special Rapporteur
will now proceed to carefully evaluate the information and
documentation that has been provided to him by government
agencies, indigenous organizations and academic institutions,
and that he has been able to collect through community dialogues,
meetings, and interviews. He will draft a report on his
mission and submit it to the UN Commission on Human Rights
in April 2003.
The Special Rapporteur would like to thank the Philippine
government for the invitation and efficient hosting of his
visit. He would also like to extend his gratitude to Indigenous
peoples themselves and their organizations, the Philippine
academe, and the UN system agencies, particularly UNDP for
its invaluable assistance for his visit, hoping that the
results will be considered as a modest contribution to the
fulfillment of the human rights of the indigenous peoples
of the Philippines.
|